Second Section
Part One:
The article “What Is a Research Paper?” by Empire State College addresses what is necessary to have a successful research paper. In a research paper the writer presents their original argument, and then uses other documents to back up their argument. In other words,the author builds upon their own knowledge of a subject by expanding it with expert information. The article also addresses the use of arguments, analysis, and the process of writing an essay. (“What is a,”)
Research writing is the expansion of one’s interests and thoughts. It is when someone asks a question, and then, documents their findings on how they came up with their answer. To be a research writer an individual asks questions and seek answers. A research writer challenges themselves to find an answer to questions that have not been answered before. To start writing a research paper the author must first address the question in which you would like to have answered. To develop this question an individual must find something or someone in which they are interested in. After that, they can then evaluate, and discover what is different or of intrigue to investigate and then document about.
My philosophy on research writing is a simple one. Find a subject that is of interest to the writer, ask questions, and then record the answer to the question for others to see. Research involves work. If the question does not interest the researcher, they will not want to do the work involved in finding the answers. I also feel a research paper involves information from the author of the paper. Whether interviews, original questionnaires, or personal experience, the author influences the outcome of their research paper. My goal as a research writer is to provide new information that has not been documented or noticed before
Part Two:
The Purdue Owl describes two main genres of research writing. These are argumentative and analytical. In an analytical reasearch paper the researcher begins by asking a question. When the researcher answers his question it is not their purpose to argue one side of the argument or the other, but to convey their “critical interpretation” of the information. In an argumentative research paper the researcher answers their question in hopes of persuading the reader. An argumentative paper should have a controversial topic that can be debated.(Baker, & Brizee, 2010)
In the process of writing my research I have considered writing about two questions. The first of these questions is, “How does the increase of staffing Registered Nurses affect patient care and cost efficiency in Assisted Living Facilities?” This question addresses the idea of a correlation between staffed Registered Nurses and the degree of care a patient receives at an Assisted Living facility. I chose this question because of a new interest in an article I had come across in one of my nursing classes. This article addresses the idea that if a Nursing Home hires either a Nurse Practitioner or a Physician Assistant patient care and cost efficiency increase. With this new knowledge I began thinking about the assisted living facility that I worked at and what staffing changes could be made there. To answer this question I would use an argumentative approach to persuade my audience to see my ideas as practical. To complete my research to compile my research article I would use personal experience along with current articles to form a hypothesis on how an increase in educated staffers in a health care facility would increase care.
The second question is,”How has my experience working in an Assisted Living show the ethics and values taught throughout the nursing profession?” In this question I would like to compare what I have learned in clinical, to what I learned in the Assisted Living facility and bring attention to a need to teach the values of nursing to all patient caregivers in the healthcare field. To write this article I would use an argumentative approach to persuade my readers to understand the importance of my experience and what I feel should be done to correct the problem. I would use personal experience to research this article and also use current articles to back up my ideas and findings in the Assisted living facility.
Part Three:
Critical Reading:
In the article Critical Reading Towards Critical Writing the author asks the reader to think critically about the texts they are reading. In other words to ask questions about the information they are reading to gain knowledge and understanding of the texts. The article also explains how to judge what the authors purpose is in writing the information. Also covered is practical tips on the critical reading process.
In the article What is Critical Reading? the author summarizes the importance of knowing the difference between facts and interpretations made by the author. The article also states the three modes of analysis used in critical reading. Finally, the article covers the goals and the tools of critical reading. This article focuses on the authors petrayal of the information presented in their works.
Reference
Knott, D. (n.d.). Critical reading towards critical writing. Retrieved from http://www.writing.utoronto /advice/reading-and-researching/critical-reading
Kurland, D.J. (n.d.). What is Critical reading. Retrieved from http://www.criticalreading.com /critical_reading.htm
Cornell University’s Evaluating Sources (2009) breaks down the evaluation process into two main steps. Then, from those steps, the process is broken down even farther into several more components of each step. The first step, the initial appraisal, is the process of evaluating the source before the reader begins to the look at the source for credible information.
Components of Initial Appraisal:
1. Author
2. Publication Date
3. Editions or Revisions
4. Publisher
5. Title of Journal
All these Components can help the reader to know if the document is a credible source of information before they begin to read the piece.
The second step, content analysis, is the actual evaluation of the document of information.
Content Analysis:
1. Intended Audience
2.Objective Reasoning
3.Coverage
4. Writing Style
5.Evaluating Reviews
These components help the reader to judge the piece of information as to whether the information is what is needed from the reader.
Last Ormondroyd, J. (2009, September 1). Critically analyzing information sources. Retrieved from http://www.library.cornell.edu/olinuris/ref/research/skill26.htm
In the Article, Critical Evaluation of Information Sources (2009) from the University of Oregon, covers the steps of evaluating the credibility of a source but also shows the importance of critically evaluating your source of information. For example the article states,
- “In the mid-1990s, a story started circulating around the Internet about the Oregon Department of Transportation’s attempts to use dynamite to dispose of a dead whale carcass. This story happens to be true, incredible as it may seem, although it happened in 1970.
- Also in the mid-1990s, a physics professor named Alan Sokal submitted a nonsense article to Social Text, a peer-reviewed journal of cultural studies, which subsequently published the article. He revealed the prank soon after in another journal.
- A web site that appeared to be sponsored by the Mankato Area Chamber & Convention Bureau extolled the various area attractions, which included whale watching on the Minnesota River (okay, let’s just think about that one for a minute). In reality, the web site was created in 1999 by a professor at Mankato State University to underscore the importance of critically evaluating information found on the Internet (2009).”
The Article then breaks down what questions to ask, and then how to answer them.
Collen, B. (2009, May 19). Critical evaluation of information sources. Retrieved from http://libweb.uoregon.edu/guides/findarticles/credibility.html
The sources of information I have used so far in my research project process have all been credible and valid sources of information. Most of them come from the writing labs of several Universities.
1) How can an annotated bibliography help you write the intro and lit review sections in your own paper?
A) They allow the writer to demostrate what content will be in their paper and also that their information is credible
2) How do you know if your sources from your anno bib are reliable, valid, timely, and unbiased?
A writer knows by only using sources used by pear reviewed journals that are within the last five years
Part Four:
According to Hacker (2009),”Most writing assignments in the social sciences are either reports of original research or rewiews of the literature written about a research topic. Often an original research report contains a ‘review of the literature’ section that places the writer’s project in the context of the previous research….You face three main challenges when writing a social science paper that draws on written sources:(1) supporting a thesis, (2) citing your sources and avoiding plagiarism, and (3) integrating quotations and other source material.” (p.415)
Hacker’s “A Writer’s Reference” (2009) breaks down the goals of writing within the APA format. Also it guides the reader through the appopriate way of writing a Research Paper. From writing a thesis to supporting the authors argument the reader begins to understand how to go about writing their research. The Book also shows examples of citing research in APA format and formatting documents in APA. (p. 415-459)
“Basics of APA Style Tutorial” (2010) gives a step-by-step overview of writing and citing in APA format. The Tutorial also shows examples of all aspects of writing a research paper. Also included, is identifying and reducing biases in writing. I like this tutorial because it walks you through the process and gives a step by step account of how the process should be done and what the researcher should be considering.
Formatting is important because it holds the author accountable for the information they are providing. Both these articles show the importance of writing with appropriate citations.
Part Five:
The Proposal
The article, “Principles of Good Research and Research Proposal Guide,” adresses the aspects of a well written research proposal. According to this article these aspects can be answered by seven different aspects that are then broken down into several even more specific questions. These seven aspects are:
Background: For example, Why is this research important and what other research has been conducted.
How will you do your research: For example, Who will be participating in your research?
Time Table: For example, When will you begin and finish your research?
Methodology: For example, How will you be conducting your research?
Ethical Issues: For example, What are the potential risks to your participants?
Data Protection: For example, How will your data be stored?
Dissemenation: For example, How will you present your findings?
The Ouline
The University of Washington’s Psychology Writing Center summarizes what is needed to write a good and flexible outline for a researh paper. Their are two types of outlines. The first of the two, is a topic outline. In a topic outline, the writer uses short phrases to indentify the different issues the writer wants to identify throughout the paper. In a sentence ouline, the writer uses complete sentences. It is used to describe complex ideas or situations.
Content of the Outline
1. Identify the Topic:Using One sentence or phrase summarize what will be covered in the paper.
2. Identify the Main Categories: What points will be covered throughout the paper.
3. Create Subcategories: These support the Main Categories.
As the writer is developing their paper they can alter and rearrange their ouline to fit their paper more appropriately
Part Six:
How to Prepare an Annotated Bibliography from Cornell University covers the process of writing an annotated bibliography. An annotated bibliography consists of:
1. A critical assessment of the source being used including the author’s backround and views on the topic
2.The correct formatting for the paper. Ex) APA, MLA
This article also gives examples of what each format looks like set up like an annotated bibliography.
Engle, M, Blumenthal, A, & Cosgrave, T. (2010, February 12). How to Prepare an annotated bibliography. Retrieved from http://www.library.cornell.edu/olinuris/ref/research/skill28.htm
Part Seven:
Audience:
In the article Writing for an Audience the author identifies the different aspects an author should consider about their intended audience before writing any kind of literary work. The article points out three key aspects to identifying the audience and writing to a certain audience. These points are:
Knowledge: What does the reader need to know
Attitudes: How words have different meanings to different audiences. Ex) My idea of Pennsylvania Dutch cooking is different than someone else’s idea of it.
Needs: Adapting to the needs of the reader so that they can better understand the information the author is trying to convey.
In the article In Writing, What is an Audience, the author defines what the audience is in terms to a writer. The article also addresses how difficult it can be to define your audience or who it is that the author is writing to. Also how important it is that you understand your audiences knowledge base and what would be interesting to the reader. It states that it is important to know what to say and when to say it
Part Eight:
1) What assignment/document was most useful to you during this proces? Explain your answer. 2) What was the most helpful feedback you received at any stage – why was it helpful? 3) What was most difficult for you during the drafting process? Easiest? WHY? 4) Where does your final essay best show your ability as a writer?.
The assignment that was the most useful was the anotated bibliography. This assignment allowed me to know what was already available in my field and also helped to form my lit. review. My most helpful feedback was when Marlen completely destroyed my paper and identified ALOT of problems. Also the writing center helped. The most difficult part of the writing process was finding a journal that I thought was appropriate for my article, the easiest was the rewriting process. Once I had my ideas on paper it was easier to make revisions. The autoethnography best shows my ability as a writer
Part Nine:
During the first Peer Review I did have two people review my paper. I needed to reformat and address the Intro paragraph. Also, my citations need reformatted. During the second peer review, the reviewer enjoyed my paper and found slight wording errors that I had missed. The blind peer reviewer never returned my paper
. The class mate also stated that he thought my topic was very important which made me feel good.
Part Ten:
I have learned alot throughout this course on how to publish research. To publish an author’s research, the author must follow the journals guidelines for publication. The journal that I have submitted to is Creative Nursing.
These guidelines were to write an article that would:
Be original
Personal Stories or accounts
Opinion Pieces
Book review
-My article is Original and is a Personal account of Assisted Living Facilties
The author should also prepare a manuscript that is APA formatted
The article should be written in Microsoft word and then attached in an email sent to the editorial office.